Talk:David Lichtenstein
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the David Lichtenstein article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Lichtenstein's place of Residence
[edit]Thetrueword88 has disputed the statement about Lichtenstein's place of Residence. He has twice replaced the statement that he resides in Monsey, NY by one that he lives in Ocean County, NJ. The source cited in the article gives David Lichtenstein's address as being in, Monsey, New York. No source has been given to show that this is not correct. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:09, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
File:David Lichtenstein.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion
[edit]
An image used in this article, File:David Lichtenstein.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:David Lichtenstein.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 06:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC) |
Reads like a promotional puff piece
[edit]While the subject might be notable enough for an article, the length and detail seem excessive in the extreme. For one thing, a bio piece should be a bio, not a detailed history of the subject's company. (If the company itself is notable, then it should be split off into a different article. An article for the Lightstone Group does in fact exist, and much of the info is duplicated here, which is itself a probleem.) Additionally, the entire article seems to have been written for promotional purposes, and there are a high number of POV and peacocking issues. Kotzker (talk) 20:31, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on David Lichtenstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160426182154/http://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/b/96d7fd2b-6dd6-47ca-9f1d-dad67409ab5a to https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/b/96d7fd2b-6dd6-47ca-9f1d-dad67409ab5a
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 6 September 2017 (UTC)